Story
Advancing nature-positive offshore wind: review calls for improved impact assessment, monitoring and mitigation
04 September 2025
A new review, published in Nature Reviews Biodiversity and led by Plymouth Marine Laboratory, synthesises current knowledge of offshore wind farm impacts across their entire life cycle. The study highlights both direct and indirect ecological effects and calls for stronger regional and international coordination, to ensure consistent assessment, monitoring and mitigation of offshore wind impacts. This work will help set the stage for nature-positive offshore energy projects that balances decarbonisation with the protection and restoration of marine biodiversity.

As the need for renewable energy increases, offshore wind farms (OWFs) are playing a pivotal role in the transition to net-zero but their rapid global expansion poses significant challenges for ocean ecosystems.
A newly published review by Plymouth Marine Laboratory, the University of Portsmouth and colleagues from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), calls for urgent regional and international coordination to assess, monitor and mitigate the ecological impacts of OWFs across their full life cycle, from construction to decommissioning.
Global offshore wind capacity is projected to nearly triple by 2030, from 117GW in 2023 to at least 320GW. Expansion is occurring across 158 countries, with the largest potential for future capacity growth identified in Europe (495 GW), Asia (292 GW) and the Americas (200 GW).
Without coordinated governance and biodiversity safeguards, the push for renewable energy could undermine international commitments under the UN Ocean Decade, the Convention on Biological Diversity and Sustainable Development Goal 14 (Life Below Water).
Dr Stephen Watson, lead author on the study and Senior Ecosystem Services Scientist at Plymouth Marine Laboratory, said:
“Offshore wind is vital for achieving net-zero goals but it must not come at the cost of ocean health. Our review shows that its impacts on biodiversity are mixed; turbines can create new habitats but also disturb species. Major evidence gaps also remain around floating wind farms and decommissioning. Closing these gaps is critical to ensuring offshore wind is both climate-positive and biodiversity-positive”.
While several reviews over the past decade have concluded that offshore wind farm development has overall negative impacts on biodiversity, our comprehensive review reveals a more complex picture. Biodiversity responses vary widely across species, regions and life-cycle stages, making it difficult to identify clear global trends from the current body of evidence.

Key findings include:
- Dual ecological impacts: OWFs create both risks and opportunities for marine life. Construction noise, habitat disturbance, physical barriers and entanglement can harm biodiversity, while turbine structures can also act as artificial reefs, providing new habitats that may enhance local biodiversity.
- Lifecycle implications: OWFs influence marine ecosystems across their entire lifecycle, from construction and operation to decommissioning. Effects span fish, invertebrates, seabirds and marine mammals, altering food webs and displacing fisheries, while at the same time offering potential refuge for some marine organisms.
- Geographic inconsistencies: Assessment, monitoring and mitigation strategies vary widely across countries, impeding cross-border understanding of ecological impacts. Also most evidence comes from Europe and North America and data from other regions around the world are scarce, creating blind spots for global policy and conservation.
- Critical knowledge gaps: Research on floating OWFs and decommissioning is still very limited. These rapidly expanding areas lack robust evidence on long-term ecological impacts, leaving their full consequences for marine ecosystems uncertain and an urgent priority for future study.
To help address the challenges, the authors urge adoption of emerging assessment and monitoring tools, such as environmental DNA (eDNA), digital twin simulations, AI-powered ecosystem models and autonomous survey technologies. They also recommend international data-sharing platforms and regionally tailored ecosystem monitoring programmes to align biodiversity protection with renewable energy targets.
Dr Watson added:
“As offshore wind farms can both enhance habitats and disrupt marine life, we need a nuanced, evidence-based approach to this rapidly expanding sector. Emerging tools such as eDNA, digital twins, AI models and autonomous surveys give us new ways to track impacts in real time and design smarter mitigation strategies. By using these innovations alongside regional monitoring plans and international data sharing, we can build offshore wind farms in a way that delivers on climate goals while safeguarding ocean biodiversity. This review aims to guide academics, policymakers, industry and conservationists toward more informed, nature-conscious development of OWFs”.